Russians accessed Democratic National Convention [DNC] email systems before the primaries.
How do we know we got the right candidates?
The DNC reported some treachery within their ranks, and fired Debbie Wasserman-Shultz.
What if miscommunications were caused by the Russians, and Debbie was scapegoated?
Voters preferred Bernie to Hillary.
We more recently learned that RNC servers were also compromised.
If not for interference, it is possible we may have had DIFFERENT CANDIDATES running.
This was not a free & fair election. There is no way of measuring the impact
the Russian hacking. This is not a question of the outcome on election day. We're talking a whole different
race, between other viable candidates on one or both sides of the contest.
Because all evidence of the Russian interference is classified, We The People cannot
know the extent of the treachery by either those hackers or our own officials.
Americans are being told that although we cannot measure the impact, it
“seems highly unlikely that actions by the Russian government contributed in any decisive way to Trump's win
over Clinton.” (Psst. Red Herring. An official answer to a misdirected question.)
Leaders in government have proceeded with a "business as usual" or "the show must go on" approach.
By the most absolute dispassionate logic, given that we cannot measure the impact, it
remains impossible to place confidence in any portion of the 2016 Election until we conduct the whole process
fresh from inception.
Election 2016 is therefore void.
TODAY IT IS INCUMBENT UPON
The Supreme Court of The United States
TO NULLIFY THE 2016 ELECTION AND CALL FOR A NEW ELECTION PROCESS.
Previously The United States has insisted that OTHER countries reset their
election process & conduct fresh elections. (i.e. The Philippines & Nigeria)
Time for a dose of our own medicine! What we propose is merely
one last reset to cap off a long series.
In the alternative, we can let this play itself out the slow painful way... with allegations and scandal, and